Debtors filing for
bankruptcy must identify those assets
which they wish to exclude from the bankruptcy estate. In other words, the debtor must specifically identify
each asset he or she wishes to keep. If a debtor fails to list an asset that might otherwise be exempt, the
bankruptcy trustee has the right to compel the debtor to turn that asset over to the trustee so that the trustee
might sell it and distribute the proceeds to the various unsecured creditors.
Note, however, that all assets are not necessarily exempt. There
are substantial limitations on which assets may be exempt, which limitations will either be governed by federal law
or Texas law. It is up to the debtor to select which set of exemption statutes will apply to his or her case.
For those assets that may be exempt under federal law,
click here. For
those assets exempt under Texas law
click here. Note that there are certain additional federal exemptions if the debtor
selects the Texas exemption laws. Those other federal exemptions are listed
here. Lastly, you should be aware that any
and all ERISA qualified retirement plans are actually not property of the bankruptcy estate. Technically such plans never
become property of the bankruptcy estate and, therefore, need not be exempt.
Patterson v. Shumate, 504 U.S. 752,
112 S.Ct. 2242 L.Ed.2d 519 (1992) (concluding that 206(d)(1) of ERISA (29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(1)) and 26 U.S.C. § 401(a)(13),
which was added by ERISA, are determinative for purposes of section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code and such qualifying plans do not constitute property of the bankruptcy estate). Note that
Patterson v. Shumate has no bearing upon IRAs.
Patterson v. Shumate, 504
U.S. at 763. (section 1051(6) of ERISA specifically exempts IRAs from its anti-alienation provisions).